By Eliana Benador
What makes the world expect that the otherwise pro-Muslim leaders of the Western hemisphere are going to step up to the challenge and actually fight those who, with their actions are precisely implementing the global dream of world domination on behalf of Islam and its all-encompasing, ad hoc legal system, sharia?
To be sure, leaders of the so-called Western civilization, have appeared threatening with grandiose statements such as the American Vice-President Joe Biden’s vow to “follow ISIL to gates of hell.” He also said that, “The American people are so much stronger, so much more resolved than any enemy can fully understand… ” Which “American people?” Maybe he refers to the civilian mercenaries that the current administration is going to shove down people’s throats?
At the international level, Americans “top diplomatic and defense leaders pressed a core coalition of 10 nations to summon the willpower to go after the Islamic State group in Iraq militarily and financially, and said they must build a plan by the time the U.N. General Assembly meets in about two weeks.”
When President Barack Obama delivered his infamous Cairo Speech in 2009, he said ” … throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.” And also, “That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
True to his word, the president has implemented measures that have facilitated the Muslim Brotherhood infiltration at key jobs of his administration.
Under his leadership, his administration ordered the removal of any rhetoric including Islam and Muslim terrorism from official manuals at government institutions, such as the FBI, CIA, DHS, and so on.
When Major Nidal Malik Hassan committed a terrorist attack against his innocent unsuspecting colleagues at Fort Hood, murdering 13 people and wounding 32 others in 2009, his was labeled “workplace violence,” not terrorism, and has remained so until now. He was sentenced to death, unanimously, in August 2013. However, as no active-duty service member has been executed since 1961, legal experts argue that it will probably take many years, if ever, before the sentence will be carried out. And, here comes the main caveat: a military death sentence requires final approval by the president, as commander in chief. Would Obama approve that? It is highly unlikely.
Obama’s allegiance to Islam is consistent: This story was published last year in Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine. It announced the appointments of six Muslim Brotherhood operatives to key positions, thus the White House went “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world, to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
A few weeks ago, on August 20, in the aftermath of James Foley’s beheading, Obama advanced his understanding of the Islamic State: “So ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents. No just god would stand for what they did yesterday and what they do every single day. ISIL has no ideology of any value to human beings. Their ideology is bankrupt. They may claim out of expediency that they are at war with the United States or the West, but the fact is they terrorize their neighbors and offer them nothing but an endless slavery to their empty vision and the collapse of any definition of civilized behavior.”
The president initially wanted to erase any association between the Islamic State and Islam but, for each atrocity committed by those terrorists, there exists the flagrant evidence of a Koran edict:
“Beheading people: “When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” (Koran 47:4).
Subjugating women and girls: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them” (Koran 4:34).
Killing Muslims: “They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another)… But if they turn back (from Islam), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliya’ (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them” (Koran 4:89).
Killing Christians: “Fight those who believe not in God nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by God and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Koran 9:29).”
Later, at a press conference in Estonia, the president first addressed the danger with a forceful rhetoric, only to retract his position a few sentences later: “We know that if we are joined by the international community, we can continue to shrink ISIL’s sphere of influence, its effectiveness, its financing, its military capabilities to the point where it is a manageable problem.”
Indeed. “shrinking” may be the president’s goal of his speech tonight.
How can anyone expect the son of a Muslim, in this case, the American president, to plan to annihilate these or any other Muslims for that matter?
Besides, it is also natural that Mr. Obama will not hesitate to send troops, most likely elite teams, of course. Bankrupting America in every possible way, is within the line of this administration.
On the other hand, the Arab League of nations is “uniting” to fight and stop the Islamic State.
It is hard to imagine Iran joining forces with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Al Qaeda, and others, and figure where the Muslim Brotherhood will fit in all this and who will be against whom. In the case of Syria, President Basher al-Assad has been fighting for years against the terrorists that Obama helped and had it not been for the intervention of President Vladimir Putin, he would be history now. To the forceful anti-Putinists, a question: Assad could be replaced by the Al Qaeda terrorists and, currently, even by the bloodier thirstiest sub-humans? Now there is a lot of choice. This, naturally, is providing the golden opportunity to bring down President Assad’s compound, in one of those air strikes.
However, the only ones who can straighten this, may be the militaries of Muslim Middle Eastern countries. They speak the same language, share the same culture and civilization.
If there is anyone who can save the day, it will be the armies of Muslim countries who will not put up with the sub-humans who are beheading babies, young children and adults, who are raping, enslaving and mutilating women, who are burying alive their own and the yazidis and Christian populations, who are lining up hundreds of men and shooting them like cowards, on the back, and more and worse.
However, the main question remains: What if this is the dream situation to achieve Muslim world domination? And, with his track record, would President Barack Obama really want to stop that?
After all, the zombies are not about to wake up.
Eliana Benador: strategist consultant, adviser, opinion writer, and speaker, was founder of Benador Associates and is head of Benador International, based in Geneva, Switzerland. Her website is www.elianabenador.com. You may follow her on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook.