America’s Socialist Revolution Has Officially Begun

On October 31, 1517, an obscure German theology professor put the finishing touches on a paper he had written about the current state of the Catholic Church, and sent it off to Archbishop Albert of Brandenberg for review.
The professor’s letter was polite and professional, with a formal tone that one might find in a modern academic work. It could hardly be described as revolutionary.
Yet within a few years, the professor would find himself excommunicated by the Pope, branded an outlaw and heretic and living in hiding under the protection of an army of followers.
His name, of course, was Martin Luther. And the publication of his famous paper, the 95 Theses, is often viewed as the start of the Protestant Reformation, one of the most important social movements in history.
The reformation was a European-wide rejection of Church authority. But its origins far predate Luther or his 95 Theses.
Mini revolts against the Church go back to the late 1300s, more than 150 years earlier.
But historians often focus on a single watershed moment to mark the beginning of a major movement or trend, even though there are always multiple events leading up to it.
For example, historians consider October 1929’s stock market crash as the start of the Great Depression, even though the London market had crashed in September, and the US market suffered a smaller crash in March.
Point is, there are always multiple, important events that could mark the beginning of a major trend or movement.
There’s a new major trend taking place right now in front of our very eyes– a modern Socialist Revolution.
People are storming into power and prominence with a belief system that bigger government, punitive taxes and nationalization of private industry will fix everything.
They find personal wealth utterly revolting, and they’ll stop at nothing to redistribute it.
We’ve been writing about this for years. But its no longer theory or conjecture. It’s happening. The revolution has begun.
There have been several watershed moments recently that future historians might view as the start of this modern Socialist Revolution… including possibly today with Bernie Sanders announcing his 2020 presidential bid.
But I think a less obvious choice would be when Amazon surrendered to the Socialists last week over its proposed headquarters in New York City.
Amazon’s expansion into New York would have brought 25,000 well-paying jobs to the city, plus state-of-the-art green construction, $10+ billion in tax revenue, land for a new school, a tech and art incubator, etc.
In exchange, the city government would give up some tax credits that were completely trivial by comparison.
But… the Socialists couldn’t keep their mouths shut.
They were disgusted that a behemoth like Amazon, headed by the richest man in the world, would receive any benefits whatsoever.
They couldn’t step back and realize that the deal was a WIN/WIN. Amazon wins. The city wins.
Socialists are only happy with a WIN/LOSE, i.e. they have to win at your expense… otherwise no deal.
So they whined and complained until Amazon walked away.
Here’s a perfect example of this WIN/LOSE mentality:
Before all the public outcry, Amazon’s proposed headquarters was within a designated “Opportunity Zone,” which meant that the company could have eventually been eligible for federal tax breaks on its $2.5 billion New York investment.
Socialists immediately lamented the gross injustice, claiming that Amazon shouldn’t receive any opportunity zone tax incentives that were “meant for the poor.”
We’ve talked about opportunity zones a few times in the past; the basic idea is that every governor across the US has designated certain portions of his/her state or territory as an “opportunity zone.”
To qualify as an opportunity zone, the area must have a poverty rate of at least 20% and a median household income level that’s at least 20% below the local average.
Federal law provides generous tax breaks for anyone who makes lucrative, long-term investments in opportunity zones– whether starting a business, redeveloping property, etc.
Talk about a win/win.
Opportunity zone investments mean that an underdeveloped community gets to enjoy more job prospects, safer neighborhoods, cleaner streets, greater economic activity, higher tax revenue, etc.
And in exchange for putting up all the money, taking all the risk and doing all the work, investors can enjoy tax-free gains.
Everyone wins.
You’d think people would be happy and grateful that some investors are risking their capital and investing their time to improve the neighborhood.
But no. The Socialists just can’t keep their mouths shut. They can’t simply accept that they’re going to get a ton of benefit for free because someone else is going to take all the risk and do all the work.
Nope. They’re only happy if they get everything for free… while you get absolutely nothing out of the deal.
That’s a win/LOSE. And it’s the foundation of the Socialist mentality.
If a rich person or a large company derives any benefit whatsoever, they have to stop the deal at all costs, even if they screw themselves in the process.
So now Amazon has pulled out, and the Socialists get 100% of nothing. Everyone loses.
And they’re insane enough to consider this a major victory. It’s as if they’re happy to screw themselves, as long as they think they can screw you even more.
It reminds me of an old socialist joke from the Soviet days.
A Russian man one day stumbles across an old metal lantern. He picks it up and shines it, and a Genie pops out, saying “I am a Communist genie… so you only get one wish instead of three. Plus, I have to give your comrade neighbor twice as much as I give you.”
So the man thinks for a moment and says, “Then I wish for you to blind me in one eye.”
This is the essence of modern socialism that is taking over America: everybody loses. And the revolution has already begun.

Cultural Marxism, Homosexual agenda, Pink Swastika, AND so much more.

So, what happened to the American traits of confidence, pride, and accountability?
The roots of Western cultural decay are very deep, having first sprouted a century ago. It began with a loose clan of ideologues inside Europe’s communist movement. Today, it is known as the Frankfurt School, and its ideals have perverted American society.
When Outcomes Fail, Just Change the Theory
Before WWI, the Marxist theory held that if war broke out in Europe, the working classes would rise up against the bourgeoisie and create a communist revolution.
Well, as is the case with much of Marxist theory, things didn’t go too well. When war broke out in 1914, instead of starting a revolution, the proletariat put on their uniforms and went off to war.
After the war ended, Marxist theorists were left to ask, “What went wrong?”
Two very prominent Marxists thinkers of the day were Antonio Gramsci and Georg Lukács. Each man, on his own, concluded that the working class of Europe had been blinded by the success of Western democracy and capitalism. They reasoned that until both had been destroyed, a communist revolution was not possible.
Gramsci and Lukács were both active in the Communist party, but their lives took very different paths.
Gramsci was jailed by Mussolini in Italy where he died in 1937 due to poor health.
In 1918, Lukács became minister of culture in Bolshevik Hungary. During this time, Lukács realized that if the family unit and sexual morals were eroded, society could be broken down.
Lukács implemented a policy he titled “cultural terrorism,” which focused on these two objectives. A major part of the policy was to target children’s minds through lectures that encouraged them to deride and reject Christian ethics.
In these lectures, graphic sexual matter was presented to children, and they were taught about loose sexual conduct.
Here again, a Marxist theory had failed to take hold in the real world. The people were outraged at Lukács’ program, and he fled Hungary when Romania invaded in 1919.
The Birth of Cultural Marxism
All was quiet on the Marxist front until 1923 when the cultural terrorist turned up for a “Marxist study week” in Frankfurt, Germany. There, Lukács met a young, wealthy Marxist named Felix Weil.
Until Lukács showed up, classical Marxist theory was based solely on the economic changes needed to overthrow class conflict. Weil was enthused by Lukács’ cultural angle on Marxism.
Weil’s interest led him to fund a new Marxist think tank—the Institute for Social Research. It would later come to be known as simply The Frankfurt School.
In 1930, the school changed course under new director Max Horkheimer. The team began mixing the ideas of Sigmund Freud with those of Marx, and cultural Marxism was born.
In classical Marxism, the workers of the world were oppressed by the ruling classes. The new theory was that everyone in society was psychologically oppressed by the institutions of Western culture. The school concluded that this new focus would need new vanguards to spur the change. The workers were not able to rise up on their own.
As fate would have it, the National Socialists came to power in Germany in 1933. It was a bad time and place to be a Jewish Marxist, as most of the school’s faculty was. So, the school moved to New York City, the bastion of Western culture at the time.
Coming to America
In 1934, the school was reborn at Columbia University. Its members began to exert their ideas on American culture.
It was at Columbia University that the school honed the tool it would use to destroy Western culture: the printed word.
The school published a lot of popular material. The first of these was Critical Theory.
Critical Theory is a play on semantics. The theory was simple: criticize every pillar of Western culture—family, democracy, common law, freedom of speech, and others. The hope was that these pillars would crumble under the pressure.
Next was a book Theodor Adorno co-authored, The Authoritarian Personality. It redefined traditional American views on gender roles and sexual mores as “prejudice.” Adorno compared them to the traditions that led to the rise of fascism in Europe.
Is it just a coincidence that the go-to slur for the politically correct today is “fascist”?
The school pushed its shift away from economics and toward Freud by publishing works on psychological repression.
Their works split society into two main groups: the oppressors and the victims. They argued that history and reality were shaped by those groups who controlled traditional institutions. At the time, that was code for males of European descent.
From there, they argued that the social roles of men and women were due to gender differences defined by the “oppressors.” In other words, gender did not exist in reality but was merely a “social construct.”
A Coalition of Victims
Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Germany when WWII ended. Herbert Marcuse, another member of the school, stayed in America. In 1955, he published Eros and Civilization.
In the book, Marcuse argued that Western culture was inherently repressive because it gave up happiness for social progress.
The book called for “polymorphous perversity,” a concept crafted by Freud. It posed the idea of sexual pleasure outside the traditional norms. Eros and Civilization would become very influential in shaping the sexual revolution of the 1960s.
Marcuse would be the one to answer Horkheimer’s question from the 1930s: Who would replace the working class as the new vanguards of the Marxist revolution?
Marcuse believed that it would be a victim coalition of minorities—blacks, women, and homosexuals.
The social movements of the 1960s—black power, feminism, gay rights, sexual liberation—gave Marcuse a unique vehicle to release cultural Marxist ideas into the mainstream. Railing against all things “establishment,” The Frankfurt School’s ideals caught on like wildfire across American universities.
Marcuse then published Repressive Tolerance in 1965 as the various social movements in America were in full swing. In it, he argued that tolerance of all values and ideas meant the repression of “correct” ideas.
It was here that Marcuse coined the term “liberating tolerance.” It called for tolerance of any ideas coming from the left but intolerance of those from the right. One of the overarching themes of the Frankfurt School was total intolerance for any viewpoint but its own. That is also a basic trait of today’s political-correctness believers.
To quote Max Horkheimer, “Logic is not independent of content.”
Recalling the Words of Winston (Not That One)
The Frankfurt School’s work has had a deep impact on American culture. It has recast the homogenous America of the 1950s into today’s divided, animosity-filled nation.
In turn, this has contributed to the undeniable breakdown of the family unit, as well as identity politics, radical feminism, and racial polarization in America.
It’s hard to decide if today’s culture is more like Orwell’s 1984 or Huxley’s Brave New World.
Never one to buck a populist trend, the political establishment in America has fully embraced the ideas of the Frankfurt School and has pushed them on American society through public miseducation.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the beacons of progressivism, are both disciples of Saul Alinsky, a devoted cultural Marxist.
And so we now live in a hyper-sensitive society in which social memes and feelings have overtaken biological and objective reality as the main determinants of right and wrong.
Political correctness is a war on logic and reason.
To quote Winston, the protagonist in Orwell’s dystopia, “Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4.”
Today, America is not free.

A MUST Read….

 
Progressivism (A.K.A. Cultural Marxism) is a leftist thought process implemented into society via media, academia, politics, and entertainment. It desires a world with no traditional families, no religion, no pride, and no identity. It promotes degeneracy, immorality, ugliness, miscegenation, false history and self-loathing. Progressivism is societal rot, it eats away at the foundations of civilization until it falls in on itself. What is left is the decayed remnants of a once-great civilization, the one time envy of the world and eternal enemy of the progressives.
 
Progressivism thrives off certain traits unique to the European that work against the best interests of the European. Those traits being empathy and altruism. It promotes out group empathy and out group altruism, and attacks those who practice in group empathy and in group altruism.
 
An example of this would be the concept that ‘charity begins at home.’ This basically means that you look after your own first and foremost, but progressivism would call this ‘racist’ and ‘discriminatory.’ They believe that charity is for all even if it is damaging to the person or nation being charitable. The empathetic and altruistic nature of the European is manipulated in this scenario, they will part with their money to feed the third world, and will support the foreign aid budget sent to the third world, but have no idea about their own nations needy.
 
They will naively support immigration from the third world believing that third world people are merely seeking a better life, yet they ignore the consequences for themselves and their own people in the long term. They fall victim to the steering of their emotions by mass media and the progressive agenda. Empathy and Altruism are emotions based on concern and sympathy for others, that is why the progressive left appeal to emotion and rarely use logic based in reality.

 
‘Progress’ basically means moving forward, advancing, onward. In relation to society, ‘progress’ supposedly means moving society forward, advancing society, or moving society onward. The question has to be therefore, progress to what exactly?
 
The answer to this question is all around you, the ‘progress’ they seek is not to advance society or Western civilization as a whole, it is to deconstruct it. To the progressives, Western civilization is the enemy, they don’t want to advance us they want to destroy us. Can anybody who is not a brainwashed drone say hand on heart that society is better today?
 
Progressivism is a false term when applied to what progressives say advances society, this is intentional. For them to deconstruct and destroy Western Civilization they needed to give it a positive term, and ‘progress’ is that term. When somebody thinks of the word progress, they think of a positive rather than a negative and this is capitalized on by the progressives.
 
Strip away the layers surrounding ‘progressivism’ and you will find Cultural Marxism, an ideology hell bent on the collapse of Western Civilization.Progressivism is a lie based on hatred, there is nothing positive about it and nothing that benefits us as a society, people or culture by falling for the agenda. The hatred of the progressives is directed at the West and the European people, our culture and traditionalism.
 
Anybody opposing the anti-Western progressive agenda will be subject to the Alinskyite tactics outlined in ‘Rules for Radicals,’ these are tactics that are used to advance the agenda. It can also be called repressive tolerance which is the brainchild of Herbert Marcuse. In practice it means the toleration of all ideas and views that are in line with the anti-Western narrative, and intolerance for all ideas and views that oppose them.
 
A good explanation of progressivism is the following:
 
‘Starting in the 1960s, academics took heightened interest in Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci’s cultural Marxism. Members of the political class glimmered onto the resulting “social justice,” affirmative action, “diversity,” multiculturalism, political correctness, and other malignancies spawned by cultural Marxism. Progressive politicians came to view society as a hodge-podge of racial, ethnic, gender-based, and now also sexual orientation-based groups locked in zero-sum combat with Western whites.
 
‘Generally speaking, cultural Marxism’s indoctrinees have learned to view morality and knowledge as “constructs” and social and economic power as commodities to be transferred from “oppressor” to “oppressed.” Progressives routinely label minorities as oppressed and anything that benefits minorities as moral.’ – Chuck
 
Some examples of the Cultural Marxist Progressivism agenda.
 
Multiculturalism/Multiracialism
 
This is one tenet of progressivism. They say that having a multiracial society is ‘progress’ and that ‘diversity is our strength.’ Progressives want a ‘post-racial’ society devoid of racial identity. They promote and support mass immigration and miscegenation and desire the day when white Europeans are a minority in once White European homelands. Can anybody who is not an anti-white see how this can possibly be called progress? When you are able to think freely and evaluate the facts, you will see that progressivism is an anti white European agenda. It isn’t about progressing the white European people, it is about destroying them.

Proof of this is seen in the demographic predictions by expert demographers that European nations including Britain, France, Sweden, the Netherlands and others, will be minority European this century. We are anti-European Union and anti EU migration, we fully recognize the problems it brings, however the main issue is the tens upon tens of millions of non-Europeans who have been brought to Europe. This is the primary reason European nations will soon become minority European.
 
Modernism
 
So called modern art and architecture is the result of the hatred of classical Western art and architecture. The progressives produce and promote ugliness in every way possible, it is all about removing the individual away from his cultural heritage. By producing modernist art and architecture they replace the historical Western character of our culture, with so called ‘modern’ and ‘progressive’ monstrosities. The progressives want to move past the historical character of our culture because they hate it, not because they want to advance it. They do this not only by attacking the culture in academia, but also by replacing the cultural expression of the West which was once a prominent feature of our culture.
 
Sexual Liberation

 
This tenet of progressivism has resulted in a culture of degeneracy promoted by the entertainment industry, porn industry and media. The sexualization of our culture has led to a decline in family values and has stigmatized the pursuit of creating a traditional family environment which includes man woman and child. Cultural Marxists thought that if you could free people from what they called ‘sexual oppression’ then you could start the process of deconstructing the West.
 
The process was started by the pseudo-scientist Sigmund Freud who tried to suggest that sexual oppression was the cause of unhappiness. The sexual revolution, a term coined by Wilhelm Reich, became the manifestation of what Freud had created. The progressives say that ‘sexual liberation’ is freedom from Western morality and religious indoctrination.
 
Eros and civilization, written by Herbert Marcuse created an environment in the 60s of ‘free love’ among the baby boomers or counterculture movement. The book is about how the oppression of human sexual instinct is geared towards social control. In a nutshell it suggests that the freedom of sexual desire and the pleasure principle is a means of human liberation from civilization, ie Western Civilization which they see a being the capitalist West. The progressives see the family as being part of the capitalist conspiracy to control people and therefore it must be deconstructed.
Homosexuality

 
Homosexuality is part of the ‘sexual liberation’ agenda, however it is also a different kind of strategy. The goal behind the normalizing and promotion of homosexuality is to corrupt and distort the natural realities behind the reasons for sex. Sex is primarily about reproduction, the continuation of the species. Without heterosexuality then the species would die out within a generation. Homosexuality and the homosexual agenda is one of the main progressive agendas. They deny at every turn the real reasons behind it and its ultimate goals, and use that term ‘progress’ to brainwash people into believing that support for, and promotion of ‘gay rights’ is good for society.
 
They say that homosexuality is normal and that it is nobody’s business what two adults get up to. They say ‘love is love’ and that we should all tolerate it. Anybody who doesn’t, and who doesn’t conform to the agenda is an ‘Intolerant homophobic bigot.’ They want children forced into same-sex households to be raised by homosexuals and believe that children should be indoctrinated from the earliest age possible to support the gay agenda. Children are the primary target of the homosexual agenda, as the new generation they are viewed as pivotal in the ‘normalization’ process.
 
Another main strategy of the homosexual agenda is to legalize ‘same-sex marriage.’ This is an assault on Western Culture which was once largely based on Christian teachings and values which does not allow same-sex marriage or accept homosexuality as a normal or acceptable practice in the eyes of God. It is not about ‘equality in marriage’ it is about targeting one of the foundations of the West in order to destroy it. In order for the homosexual agenda to ‘progress’ therefore, means a concerted attack upon the religious opposition to it.
 
Another reason for the promotion of the homosexual agenda, is because the progressives believe that there is no absolute truth or moral standard, no moral absolutism. Anything goes as far as the progressive is concerned, anything that advances the ongoing assault on the West. They will say that nothing is absolute, and therefore we ‘shouldn’t judge.’ Yes the people who scream ‘who are you to judge’ are the most judgmental people you could ever have the misfortune to meet.
 
An example of moral relativism would be any practice that we in the West consider barbaric such as Female Genital Mutilation, the moral relativist would say that the practice is a moral practice within a certain culture, and therefore we shouldn’t judge.
 
The educational institutions push moral relativism onto the young and impressionable, telling them that all beliefs and lifestyles are moral and therefore valid, except beliefs that run counter to the narrative of the agenda however. This means that parents are losing the fight to be the moral educators of their children. The progressives believe that in order to create a ‘truly egalitarian and equal society,’ that education should teach (indoctrinate) children with homosexual propaganda.
 
Homosexuality is also opposed on the basis of the natural requirement and natural intention for man and woman to procreate. The progressive will say that ‘homosexuality can be found in nature,’ but that wouldn’t make it normal or natural. In nature, things have a design and purpose, and the design and purpose of the male and female is to procreate. Attraction and sexual chemistry between male and female therefore is the normal and natural requirement for procreation. Anything else is abnormal and unnatural. Any examples of so called ‘homosexuality in nature’ are merely an act of dominance and not a normal natural sexual act.
 
Progressives believe that an extreme minority in society who engage in this type of behavior, should be empowered to dictate to the overwhelming heterosexual majority, who they consider to be a ‘bigoted majority.’
 
The term ‘homophobia’ was created by George Weinberg, it has become one the main Cultural Marxist buzzwords and along with ‘racist’ has caused untold damage. ‘Homophobia’ suggests a fear of homosexuals and what they say is an illogical heterosexual reaction to them. I would call ‘homophobia’ a natural feeling of utter revulsion for an unnatural behavior.
 
Eradication of the Nuclear Family
 
Progressives see the family as an oppressive unit that pushes racism, sexism, homophobia and fascism onto children. They say that the family is patriarchal, authoritative and hierarchical. They believe that after the eradication of the family, they can fill children with the ideas of ‘equality’ and ‘egalitarianism.’ The methods in which they set out to destroy the family are to promote homosexuality, feminism, sexual liberation and a reliance on the state. The role of the father has also been under attack, cut the father out of the family unit and the job is already half done. The family is labeled as a ‘generational chain of oppression.’
 
 
Progressives believe that there should be no national borders anywhere, they believe in the full and absolute freedom of movement for all people of the world. This in reality means no borders in nations that are majority white European. The desire of the non-European people to come to Europe is vastly greater than the reverse. This belief in no borders is in line with the Communist ‘world without borders’ mantra.
 
Progressiveness (A.K.A. Cultural Marxism) is a leftist thought process implemented into society via media, academia, politics and entertainment. It desires a world with no traditional families, no religion, no pride, and no identity. It promotes degeneracy, immorality, ugliness, miscegenation, false history and self loathing. Progressivism is societal rot, it eats away at the foundations of a civilization until it falls in on itself. What is left is the decayed remnants of a once great civilization, the one time envy of the world and eternal enemy of the progressives.
 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201656699615049&l=f6c28c16d1

Gays
Claims that gay parents are just as capable of raising children as straight parents are misrepresented. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable…
Between 24% and 90% of lesbians report being psychologically abused by their partners. Source: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/…
Gay men are 60x more likely to have HIV than straight men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
Gays are more likely than straight people to have mental illness. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
1/4 gay men in America have had over 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homos…
43% of gay men have over 500 partners. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Homos…
Gay men are six times more likely to commit suicide than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequ…
Gay men are 12x more likely to use amphetamines than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequ…
Gay men are 10x more likely to use heroin than straight men. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequ…
Liberal arguments in favor of homosexuality are based on logical fallacies. Source: http://hrcak.srce.hr/index….
10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners. Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable…
Gay people are 2-3x more likely to abuse alcohol than straight people. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequ…
Up to 50% of lesbians have reported sexual abuse. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
79% of homosexual men say over half of their sex partners are strangers. Source: http://www.amazon.com/Unequ…
99.8% of lesbian, gay and bisexual teens will change their sexual orientation within 13 years. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
Two-thirds of men and women who were homosexual change their orientation to heterosexual five years later. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/book…
Two thirds of self-identified lesbians later have heterosexual relationships. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/book…
Identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual does not end sexual questioning or confusion. Source: http://psycnet.apa.org/book…
One in eight gay men in London has HIV. Source: http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2…
Gay men are twice as likely as straight men to be in interracial relationships. Source: http://sf.oxfordjournals.or…
In Australia, 25% of homosexuals have had more than 100 sex partners. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 63% of the country’s syphilis cases. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
In 2010, homosexuals were about 200 times more likely than everyone else to be diagnosed with HIV. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Gay men are 15 times more likely to have Hepatitis B than everyone else. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Homosexuals are more to use illegal drugs and drink to excess than straight people. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Homosexuals are more likely than straight people to have anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and to commit suicide. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Gay men are 10-15 times more likely than straight men to have eating disorders. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
40% to 60% of serial killers are homosexuals. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Homosexual men are more likely to have been abused by their partners than straight men. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Monogamy is not a central feature of most homosexual relationships. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Married homosexual men are 50% more likely than straight couples to divorce. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
In the Netherlands, the average homosexual in a “steady relationship” has seven to eight affairs per year. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Over 20% of older homosexuals have had more than 500 different sex partners. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
The average gay man has several dozen sex partners per year. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
28% of homosexuals have had sex with over a thousand men. For straight men? Just 25% have had sex with more than 10 women. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
Most “long term relationships” between gay men last less than eight years. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
Among gay Canadian men in “committed relationships, only 25% were monogamous. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
In one study, only 9% of gay men were monogamous. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
75% of straight men an are faithful, compared to just 4.5% of gay men. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
In Berlin, 83% of gay men in “steady” relationships had had frequent affairs in the last year. Source: http://advindicate.com/arti…
Infection rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia are increasing among active homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker….
Gay men, 1% of the population, account for 83% of syphilis cases. Source: http://www.americanthinker….
Syphilis was almost eradicated, but made a comeback among homosexual men. Source: http://www.americanthinker….
Active homosexual men are 17 times more likely than straight people to have anal cancer. Source: http://www.americanthinker….
Lesbians are 2.5x more likely than straight women to be obese. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to have eating disorders. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Lesbians are twice as likely as straight women to be stalked or physically abused by their partners. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Married lesbians are 2-3 times more likely to divorce than straight couples. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
Homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals are poorer than straight people. Source: http://takimag.com/article/…
America has spent $700 million promoting gay rights abroad – an “integral” part of American foreign policy. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2015…
Transsexuals
Transsexuals are four times more likely than the average person to be infected with HIV. Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4…
About 88% of children who have gender dysphoria do not hold those beliefs when they grow older. Source: http://www.npr.org/template…
Only 12% of boys who believe they are transsexuals still believe so when they are older. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
MRI scans indicate that MtF transsexuals are either men aroused by the thought of possessing female genitalia or homosexuals who want to seduce straight men. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
41% of transsexuals have tried and failed to commit suicide. Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4…
Transsexuals who undergo sex reassignment surgery are more likely to commit suicide. Source: http://journals.plos.org/pl…
Most young transsexuals have committed self-harm within the last twelve months. Source: http://saravyc.sites.olt.ub…
65% of transsexual youth have seriously considered suicide within the last year. Source: http://saravyc.sites.olt.ub…
37% of transsexual youth have attempted suicide within the last year. Source: http://saravyc.sites.olt.ub…
1 in 10 young transsexuals has attempted suicide more than three times in the last year. Source: http://saravyc.sites.olt.ub…
Only 21% of transsexuals can sucessfully pass as the opposite gender. Source: http://www.thetaskforce.org…
53% of mothers of transsexual children have Borderline Personality Disorder, compared to only 6% of mothers of normal children. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov…
16% of transsexuals have been sent to jail or prison, compared to 2.7% of the general population. Source: http://www.avp.org/storage/…
Gay and transgender students are half as likely to graduate high school as straight students. Source: https://www.americanprogres…
20-40% of homeless children are transsexuals. Source: https://www.americanprogres…
44% of transsexuals with a job are underemployed. Source: http://www.hrc.org/blog/ent…
Children raised by gay couples are twice as likely to be in poverty as children of straight married couples. Source: http://williamsinstitute.la…
“24% of lesbians and bisexual women are poor, compared with only 19% of heterosexual women.” Source: http://williamsinstitute.la…
1/3 transsexuals are being treated for mental health. Source: http://www.medicaldaily.com…
85% of transsexuals show signs of psychological distress or have been recently treated for mental health. Source: http://www.medicaldaily.com…
44% of transsexuals show signs of clinical depression. Source: http://www.medicaldaily.com…
Transsexuals are more likely to have autism than the general population. Source: http://link.springer.com/ar…
Transsexuals college students are five times more likely than all students to have an eating disorder. Source: http://www.jahonline.org/ar…
Transsexuals college students are 30 times more likely than straight men to have eating disorders. Source: http://www.jahonline.org/ar…
27% of MtF transsexuals test positive for HIV. Only 12% report it. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/grou…
Transsexuals are several times more likely than normal people to have schizophrenia. Source: http://www.hindawi.com/jour…
Worldwide, male-to-female transsexuals are 50 times likely to have HIV than normal people. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/grou…
Transsexuals have higher rates of drug and alcohol abuse, prostitution, and incarceration than normal people. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/grou…
Transsexuals have higher rates of unemployment, homelessness, and attempted suicide than normal people. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/grou…
Transsexuals are four times more likely to live in extreme poverty than the general population. Source: http://www.transequality.or…
Transsexuals are twice as likely to be unemployed as the general population. Source: http://www.transequality.or…
Non-white transsexuals are four times as likely to be unemployed as the general population. Source: http://www.transequality.or…
Transsexuals are twice as likely to be homeless as cisgendered people. Source: http://www.transequality.or…
1 in 5 transsexuals has been homeless at least once in their lives. Source: http://www.transequality.or…
Close to 80% of children who feel transsexual will abandon their sexual confusion as they age. Source: http://www.wsj.com/articles…
Many transsexuals choose to take hormone treatments over HIV medication. Source: http://news.yahoo.com/one-g…
Male-to-female transsexuals are 50 times more likely than normal people to have HIV. Source: http://news.yahoo.com/one-g…

Cultural Marxism = Political Correctness

Class Warfare As The Winning Democrat ‘Liberal’ Strategy

Why Conservatism Has Lost The Battle For The U.S. Government
“There is not any question today that liberals/ progressives almost totally rule the five idea-producing, attitude-fashioning social institutions — academia, judiciary, news industry, spiritual leadership, and entertainment establishment.” — Colonel Tom Snodgrass Dec ’12

Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness and the Frankfurt School – ULTIMATE COLLECTION

A Brief History of Cultural Marxism and Political Correctness by Jefrey D. Breshears

The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness” by Raymond V. Raehn

Previous articleCovington Kid Updates
Next articleRSN gets Qed & Top News for Tuesday Feb 26th, 2019
Col. Tom Snodgrass (Ret.)
Col. Thomas Snodgrass, USAF (retired) served over a year in Peshawar, Pakistan, working with Pakistani military intelligence. During his year in Vietnam he daily scheduled 130 U.S. Army and Air Force intelligence collection aircraft. In his final overseas tour he was the U.S. Air Attaché behind the Iron Curtain in Warsaw, Poland. In total, Col. Snodgrass was variously an Intelligence Officer or an International Politico-Military Affairs Officer (military diplomat) serving duty tours in seven foreign countries, as well as teaching military history and strategy at the Air War College, US Air Force Academy, and USAF Special Operations School during a thirty-year military career. Additionally, he was awarded an Air Force scholarship to get a history master’s degree in revolutionary insurgent warfare at the University of Texas, as well as being granted a year’s educational sabbatical to teach and to write about international relations as an Air Force Research Associate in the graduate school at the Center for Advanced International Studies, University of Miami, Florida. Following the Air Force, Col. Snodgrass was an adjunct professor of military history for ten years at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Arizona.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR